M.T. v. J.-Y.T., 2008 SCC 50
Click here to link to the full judgment.
(Family law / Divorce / Family assets)
M, a civil servant, and J, a judge, were married in 1992, having been together since 1985. In 2004, they separated. J was more than 20 years older than M, had paid for several training and education programs for M during their relationship, and paid for moving and educational expenses after separation. In divorce proceedings, J sought to exclude benefits under his judge's pension from partition. The Court, interpreting Quebec law, found that M had not defaulted on her obligation to "contribute to forming and maintaining the family patrimony" during marriage. Absent such a default, there was no reason to deviate from an equal partition of the family patrimony upon divorce.